Munzee Madness

We went on a road trip this weekend gone and found a cache that contained a 'Munzee'. I'd never heard of these before, but I downloaded the app to my iPhone and scanned the QR code. Instantly, I received some points for the scan (the 'capture') and my interest was piqued. We picked up a couple more over the weekend and the idea has stuck.

According to the website: "Munzee is a real world scavenger hunt game where players are rewarded for finding and capturing hidden objects." The objects are actually printed QR codes - those 3D barcodes that have appeared everywhere - that are then stuck to objects. I've only found them stuck on the back of signs so far.

I was in London for work today and went out - despite the rain - into territory round my office where I have found all the Geocaches in search of Munzees. I found loads, including some virtual ones, and even got First To Find for a couple. This is a very new game in this country and I'm pretty interested in seeing where it goes.

I'm about to head out into the rain to deploy my own first Munzee in a moment. I suggest you check out the website and get involved!

Groups: To Log or Not To Log

Imagine arriving at a cache site with a group of friends, knowing in advance that the cache is either notoriously difficult to find or involves some degree of athletic ability to retrieve. Eventually, someone locates the cache, or alternatively balances their way up a slippy slimy tree and brings it down to the ground. Who can legitimately sign it? Who is allowed to claim that they found the cache?

This has been the subject of some discussion among some of my caching friends of late. It's not really bothered me much until I've started creating more complex or dangerous caches myself. I've begun to form an opinion recently and I'd like to share my thoughts.

Caching in a group (or a pair) makes the hobby a lot more fun. In fact, the social interaction is what really makes it worthwhile for me. It's doing something as a team, with a group of mates, with your girlfriend. I'm not suggesting that group caching should be limited or stopped in anyway. It's exactly how I get my kids out for a walk of a weekend. We regularly head out and, together, collect a circuit of caches. In fact, the kids argue robustly over who gets to find the cache and who gets to put it back afterwards! We all claim the cache as 'found' even though, probably, my four year old grabbed it from behind the tree.

Clearly, I have no problem with group caching and everyone should be able to claim and log the find, right?

Right. Except that there are a number of caches where that's just not appropriate. Since the frosts have receded and the nights have grown longer, I've been heading out to collect a number of tree climb caches. I've even set one myself. These tend to be rated as fairly low difficulty (you can see it in the tree), but with a high terrain level. You don't need special equipment, but you do need to be able to climb the tree, hold on while signing the log with one hand, and get down again uninjured.

I don't believe that it is fair to the cache owner - or moreover the person who risks life and limb to retrieve the cache - for everyone in the group to claim the find unless they too go up the tree. I agree that this means that not everyone will be able to log the find, despite having walked just as far as those who do manage it. This is the point of high terrain caches, of course: to test the mettle of the finder. If you can't get up the tree (or under the bridge, or balance on the rafters, or abseil out of the tower...) then you can't log the cache.

This is the way we have decided to behave while hunting high terrain caches. If I can get up the tree, but Katy can't, then I log it and she doesn't. End of story.

But here is some grey area thinking: What if a cacher climbs up and touches the cache? In a pair, can one collect the cache, they both sign it and then the other places it back? How does this work for larger groups?

The same might be seen to be true for very difficult to find caches. We've found a few that have kept us working on them for ages. Sometimes, multiple visits have been needed to the cache site before we've finally unearthed it. Should we both log the cache when, technically, only one of us found it? We both looked just as hard as one another and one essentially got lucky. When caching with friends, it's not very easy to find a challenging cache, sign it and place it back without your friends spotting you! And I know that I tend to shout "Got it!" before I've even thought about it...

The other other challenging area is puzzle caches. Should everyone have to solve the puzzle before they get to log it? I'm tempted to agree with this premise, but in reality it rarely happens that way. Most often, Katy has the time to solve the puzzles (part time worker, see...) and I provide an extra pair of eyes at the cache site. Not always, but most often. Should I be logging these?

I'm interested in starting some healthy debate on this subject, so please feel free to comment below.

Geocaching abroad

Last weekend, we managed three more countries in which we've now geocached: France, Belgium and the Netherlands. These add to the UK and Iceland to give us a grand, slightly shameful, total of five countries.

Geocaching abroad is highly recommended although it does include a few added difficulties, namely a language barrier that can be an issue with some of the caches, especially the hints! A little prior planning, including judicious use of google translate, and you should be fine :-)

So next time you go abroad, have a quick look on geocaching.com and enjoy some foreign caches too. We saw some fantastic places that we'd otherwise not have found in Iceland as a result!

Where's the Pin?!

I've just made a new cache container using a pine cone that I picked up over the weekend. Can't wait to drop this one off somewhere!

Here are the raw materials. One pine cone and one waterproof nano container.



Then I drilled out the middle with a 14mm bit:



And finally inserted the cache into the camo container:



Like it? I'm quite pleased with it... especially now that it has been released into the wild: